Research in Catalonia, or better said, the environment in which researchers work in our country, is fragile and is not immutable. Like landscapes, research is very sensitive to changes which take place in the environment and one must be attentive to these changes in order to maintain an adequate environment for researchers.
It must be said that for almost a decade, research – especially biomedical – has created a tapestry where the best researchers have carried out good projects.
The leadership of some research centres and institutes, hospitals and universities have made a concerted effort in making this happen. Actions like the ICREA programme, the Catalan Institute for Research and Advanced Studies, have contributed very effectively in enabling these institutions to host national and international researchers of the highest calibre who have chosen projects which, at the very least, have changed some paradigms.
Nevertheless, we need to pay attention to some specific actions which have taken place recently, such as the Advisory Board in Research and Innovation Policy (CAPRIS), which will need to be assessed in coming years, not only with regards bibliometric impact but also in terms of how our health system might be improved in very specific fields such as precision medicine, big data and data analysis, and innovation in health.
But spring is not everlasting, and nor does the fullness of summer exist if new spring times do not come. For this to be possible it is not enough to live from past gains obtained in the good times, one needs to grow. But how?
- As we have been doing till now, we need to take on senior researchers, some from abroad. It is important but not enough. We need to encourage the training of young people, well-funded and with guarantees that if they are good there is a future for them in research. We are not doing this or we are doing it in dribs and drabs. I am referring to potent PhD/MD projects and others of tenure track with a posterior assessment of excellence that can permit a competitive career in research.
- By investing in infrastructures and technologies. We have done it, but we need to persist in our efforts and in the most efficient way possible.
- By limiting policy in institutes and centres to those where the critical mass generates an environment which allows the best projects to come to fruition. And by closing the centres that do not meet these requirements.
- By proposing large interdisciplinary programmes that favour frontier research and are open to researchers from a variety of institutions. We lack these.
- By having a policy which stimulates private investment in research, while facilitating a policy of donations. This has begun and there are foundations which have played a key role, CELLEX or La Caixa, among others, but this policy needs to be broadened and strengthened. Public funds have a ceiling that needs to be broken.
- By generating a laboratory of ideas in biomedical research which sets possible horizons.
- By assessing the efficiency of the IPA of different institutions and redesigning them for a research of the future, especially in order to be able to compete internationally, at the European Council, the NIH and other scenarios.
These are some brief notes for a more extensive and possible discussion. In any case, attention, autumn has already begun.